Prepare before, close properly after. You get a timed agenda, a facilitation guide for the room, and an actions summary ready to send the moment the meeting ends.
Talk or type. Describe the meeting the way it's in your head. If your desired outcome is too vague to run a meeting on, the tool tells you, and offers a sharper version before it builds anything.
Most meetings end with a vague sense of agreement and no record of who agreed to do what. A week later, nobody can quite remember, and nothing has moved.
The fault is rarely the people in the room. It's that the meeting had no clear outcome going in, and no explicit actions coming out. Meeting Ignite fixes both ends: it pushes you to define what the meeting is actually for before you start, and it turns what was agreed into a summary you can send before everyone has left the building.
Writing up actions, chasing who owns what, drafting the follow-up: done properly it takes the best part of an hour, so it gets skipped, and the meeting quietly leaks its value over the following week.
Meeting Ignite does the close in the room: the actions summary and the follow-up note are written before you stand up. Across the whole suite, for a manager with eight direct reports, the five tools hand back two and a half to three working days every quarter.
Tested in a workshop with 27 managers from 11 businesses across the UK, Europe and the US.
Set the outcome, the type, the group. Get a timed agenda and a facilitation guide built for who's in the room.
Enter what was agreed. Get a formatted actions summary and a follow-up note, ready to send.
Every step, on a meeting a manager actually has to run. Nothing staged.
Pick the meeting type, team meeting, project kick-off, or problem-solving, and describe the outcome you need. Not the topic, the outcome: what will be decided, agreed, or produced by the time everyone leaves.
Sarah's is a project kick-off. The outcome she wants: a clear first-step plan for the ACME review, with the work shared out and owned.
This is the check that runs across the suite, and it earns its place here. Sarah's first go described the outcome as "a plan for the first step", which is too loose to run a meeting on. The tool flags it and offers a sharper version.
The rewrite is specific: agree a first-step action plan, with timelines, the resources needed, and responsibilities assigned to named people. You can take it, or keep your own wording. Either way you've been made to think about what the meeting is really for.
Tell it how well the group works together and how often they meet. From that, it recommends a facilitation mode and a cadence. A new, low-trust group needs leading firmly. An established team needs room to run.
For Sarah's kick-off the tool recommends a directive mode, lead the structure clearly, set the agenda, make it safe for people who don't yet know the norms. And it flags the cadence trap: a kick-off is a one-off, so schedule the first check-in before anyone leaves.
The guide opens with the one thing to hold in mind, then gives a timed agenda you can share in advance: opening, context, the working session, discussion, close, each with minutes against it.
Alongside it sits the facilitation guide for the room itself: how to open, how to draw out a quieter voice like Sarah's, how to handle a dominant one, and how to close so that everyone leaves knowing who owns what.
Switch to the Close stage. Type what was agreed, one action per line, and any key decisions. This is the two-minute job everyone means to do later and never does.
Out comes the close-out: an actions summary, each action with an owner and a deadline, marked to share with everyone. And a follow-up note written to the team, ready to send. The meeting ends with a record, not a vague memory.
Meeting Ignite, like every tool in the suite, produces two editable and shareable outputs. An actions summary, the record of who owns what and by when, marked to share with everyone. And a follow-up note to the group, in your voice.
The record. Who owns what, by when.
A productive kick-off for the ACME strategy review. Below are the actions we agreed.
First check-in: a fortnight today.
Written to the team. Ready to send.
Everyone,
Thanks for a sharp kick-off on the ACME review. We've agreed the first steps: the agenda, the resources, and who owns each piece.
The full action list is below. Please check yours and flag anything that looks off.
Next check-in is a fortnight today. Good start.
The sharpening check stops you the moment your stated outcome is too loose to run a meeting on. Most wasted meetings are lost here, before anyone has walked in.
Actions with owners and deadlines, plus a follow-up note, written before everyone stands up. The hour of admin that usually gets skipped is already done.
A standing meeting with no clear outcome burns salaried hours every week it runs. Define the outcome going in and close with owned actions coming out, and the same hour in the diary finally earns its place.
Take a meeting you're running this week. Define the outcome, get the agenda, and close it properly afterwards. See how much less leaks away.
Three free uses. No card required.